Triple
T36066632
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Aurelius |
E1043248
|
entity |
| Predicate | hasPraenomenExamples |
P204716
|
FINISHED |
| Object | Marcus Aurelius |
E14517
|
NE FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Marcus Aurelius | Statement: [Aurelius, hasPraenomenExamples, Marcus Aurelius]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: hasPraenomenExamples Context triple: [Aurelius, hasPraenomenExamples, Marcus Aurelius]
-
A.
isPraenomenOf
Indicates that a given personal name functions as the praenomen (given name) of a specific individual.
-
B.
praenomenCommonlyUsed
Indicates that a particular praenomen (personal first name) is commonly used or frequently occurring within a given context or population.
-
C.
memberHasPraenomen
Indicates that a member is associated with or bears a specific praenomen (personal given name).
-
D.
praenomenOrNomen
Indicates that the related name element functions either as a personal given name (praenomen) or as a family/clan name (nomen) within a naming system.
-
E.
praenomenAbbreviation
Indicates that one form of a Roman personal name is an abbreviated version of its full praenomen.
- F. None of above. chosen
Provenance (5 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69f76e2fd3248190b900d9a492bf5a7a |
completed | May 3, 2026, 3:48 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_6a037c92f03c8190ae2751270b195423 |
completed | May 12, 2026, 7:16 p.m. |
| NED1 | Entity disambiguation (via context triple) | batch_6a38d536f78c8190ac037c559130d678 |
completed | June 22, 2026, 6:24 a.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_6a037a0895b48190acdd88dc10db7be7 |
completed | May 12, 2026, 7:05 p.m. |
| PDg | Predicate description generation | batch_6a037c82f8c88190bd77a086023ac0e1 |
completed | May 12, 2026, 7:16 p.m. |
Created at: May 3, 2026, 4:08 p.m.