Triple
T3604169
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | British concession in Hankow |
E76329
|
entity |
| Predicate | instanceOf |
P0
|
FINISHED |
| Object | British overseas settlement |
C78
|
CONCEPT FINISHED |
How this triple was built (1 step)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
CD
Concept disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target class: British overseas settlement Context triple: [British concession in Hankow, instanceOf, British overseas settlement]
-
A.
British Crown dependency
A British Crown dependency is a self-governing territory under the sovereignty of the British Crown that is not part of the United Kingdom but relies on it for defense and international representation.
-
B.
former British colony
chosen
A former British colony is a territory that was once governed or administered by the British Empire but has since gained independence or undergone a change in political status.
-
C.
British protectorate
A British protectorate was a territory that retained its own internal government but was under the protection and partial control of the British Empire, particularly in matters of foreign policy and defense.
-
D.
constituent country of the United Kingdom
A constituent country of the United Kingdom is one of the four primary political divisions—England, Scotland, Wales, or Northern Ireland—that together form the sovereign state of the UK, each with its own distinct legal, cultural, and administrative identity.
-
E.
former Dutch colony
A former Dutch colony is a territory that was once governed, administered, or significantly controlled by the Netherlands as part of its overseas colonial empire, but has since gained independence or been transferred to another sovereignty.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (1 batch)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69ad85d93dcc819094fba90cf70f4996 |
completed | March 8, 2026, 2:21 p.m. |
Created at: March 8, 2026, 3:22 p.m.