Triple

T36014198
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Florida Platform E1041793 entity
Predicate continuedDevelopmentDuring P194578 FINISHED
Object Cretaceous LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Cretaceous | Statement: [Florida Platform, continuedDevelopmentDuring, Cretaceous]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: continuedDevelopmentDuring
Context triple: [Florida Platform, continuedDevelopmentDuring, Cretaceous]
  • A. developsDuring
    Indicates that one process, condition, or characteristic comes into existence or forms over the course of a specified time period, phase, or event.
  • B. laterDevelopments
    Indicates that subsequent events, changes, or outcomes occurred following an earlier situation or state.
  • C. redevelopmentContinuedIn
    Indicates that a redevelopment process or project persisted or carried on within a specified time period or location.
  • D. developedThrough
    Indicates that something came into existence, was created, or was brought to its current form by means of a specified process, method, or developmental pathway.
  • E. revisedDevelopmentResumed
    Indicates that work on a previously revised development effort has been restarted after a pause or interruption.
  • F. None of above. chosen

Provenance (4 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69f76e2b981881908e4e160607fa82eb completed May 3, 2026, 3:47 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69fd7b0503a08190ba07338365b6fcc9 completed May 8, 2026, 5:56 a.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69fd7a9733dc81909199f453c0cc2bc1 completed May 8, 2026, 5:54 a.m.
PDg Predicate description generation batch_69fd7b042a548190b3abe31bc3258278 completed May 8, 2026, 5:56 a.m.
Created at: May 3, 2026, 4:07 p.m.