Triple
T35976817
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Nebraska Ho-Chunk dialect |
E1040442
|
entity |
| Predicate | instanceOf |
P0
|
FINISHED |
| Object | regional variety of the Ho-Chunk language |
C62650
|
CONCEPT FINISHED |
How this triple was built (1 step)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
CD
Concept disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target class: regional variety of the Ho-Chunk language Context triple: [Nebraska Ho-Chunk dialect, instanceOf, regional variety of the Ho-Chunk language]
-
A.
variety of the Ho-Chunk language
chosen
A variety of the Ho-Chunk language is a distinct regional or social form of Ho-Chunk characterized by systematic differences in pronunciation, vocabulary, and/or grammar while remaining mutually intelligible with other forms.
-
B.
Kickapoo language variety
A Kickapoo language variety is a specific dialect or form of the Kickapoo language, distinguished by its unique phonological, lexical, and grammatical features used by particular Kickapoo-speaking communities.
-
C.
Pawnee language variety
A Pawnee language variety is a specific form or dialect of the Pawnee language distinguished by unique phonological, lexical, or grammatical features associated with particular speaker communities or regions.
-
D.
regional variety of the Choctaw language
A regional variety of the Choctaw language is a geographically distinct form of Choctaw characterized by unique phonological, lexical, or grammatical features shared by speakers in a particular area.
-
E.
Otomi language variety
An Otomi language variety is a specific regional or social form of the Otomi language, distinguished by its own phonological, lexical, and grammatical features within the broader Otomi linguistic continuum.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (1 batch)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69f76e27758c81909b711cf38a130aaf |
completed | May 3, 2026, 3:47 p.m. |
Created at: May 3, 2026, 4:07 p.m.