Triple
T35906764
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Garnacha Tinta |
E1038493
|
entity |
| Predicate | majorRegion |
P285
|
FINISHED |
| Object |
Campo de Borja
Campo de Borja is a Spanish wine region in Aragón renowned for producing robust, fruit-forward red wines, particularly from the Garnacha grape.
|
E2160828
|
NE FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Campo de Borja | Statement: [Garnacha Tinta, majorRegion, Campo de Borja]
NEDg
Description generation
gpt-5.1
Instruction
Generate a one-sentence description of the target entity. You are given a context triple in the form (subject, predicate, object), where the object is the target entity. # Instructions Use the triple to infer relevant information about the entity. Describe the entity based on what is most defining, well-known. Avoid repeating the information from the triple, unless really essential. # Response Format Return only the sentence: "Description: [one-sentence description of the target entity]"
Input
Entity: Campo de Borja Triple: [Garnacha Tinta, majorRegion, Campo de Borja]
Generated description
Campo de Borja is a Spanish wine region in Aragón renowned for producing robust, fruit-forward red wines, particularly from the Garnacha grape.
Provenance (5 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69f76e2259608190bf6788a132e0d139 |
completed | May 3, 2026, 3:47 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69f7aa6fd79c8190b1a70068ace78068 |
completed | May 3, 2026, 8:05 p.m. |
| NED1 | Entity disambiguation (via context triple) | batch_6a38ae297d2c8190adbec34ef206cc9a |
completed | June 22, 2026, 3:38 a.m. |
| NEDg | Description generation | batch_6a38ae942ddc8190b125685dbf7407e2 |
completed | June 22, 2026, 3:40 a.m. |
| NED2 | Entity disambiguation (via description) | batch_6a38af0c461c8190a7332d1709b5553c |
completed | June 22, 2026, 3:42 a.m. |
Created at: May 3, 2026, 4:07 p.m.