Triple

T35906561
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Southern Lechitic E1038486 entity
Predicate ISO639Representative P183959 FINISHED
Object csb (Kashubian) LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: csb (Kashubian) | Statement: [Southern Lechitic, ISO639Representative, csb (Kashubian)]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: ISO639Representative
Context triple: [Southern Lechitic, ISO639Representative, csb (Kashubian)]
  • A. ISO639Language
    Indicates that an entity is associated with a language identified or classified according to the ISO 639 language code standard.
  • B. ISO639-3ReferenceName
    Indicates the standardized reference name assigned to a language in the ISO 639-3 coding system.
  • C. ISO639-1Equivalent
    Indicates that two language identifiers are equivalent according to the ISO 639-1 two-letter language code standard.
  • D. ISO639Macrolanguage
    Indicates that a language variety is part of a broader ISO 639-defined macrolanguage grouping that encompasses multiple closely related individual languages.
  • E. ISO639-6Code
    Indicates the standardized ISO 639-6 four-letter code that uniquely identifies a specific language variety or dialect.
  • F. None of above. chosen

Provenance (4 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69f76e2259608190bf6788a132e0d139 completed May 3, 2026, 3:47 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69f7aaabb58c8190bf81673608ecfb6e completed May 3, 2026, 8:06 p.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69f7a8d435288190b30b1991fb003121 completed May 3, 2026, 7:58 p.m.
PDg Predicate description generation batch_69f7aa33e0488190a135166bb67e1118 completed May 3, 2026, 8:04 p.m.
Created at: May 3, 2026, 4:07 p.m.