Triple
T35901855
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Jova |
E1038371
|
entity |
| Predicate | instanceOf |
P0
|
FINISHED |
| Object | variety of the Opata language |
C62496
|
CONCEPT FINISHED |
How this triple was built (1 step)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
CD
Concept disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target class: variety of the Opata language Context triple: [Jova, instanceOf, variety of the Opata language]
-
A.
variety of the Katu language
A variety of the Katu language is a distinct regional or social form of Katu characterized by systematic differences in pronunciation, vocabulary, and/or grammar while remaining mutually intelligible with other Katu forms.
-
B.
variety of the Kati language
A variety of the Kati language is a distinct regional or social form of Kati characterized by its own systematic differences in pronunciation, vocabulary, and sometimes grammar while remaining mutually intelligible with other Kati forms.
-
C.
Otomi language variety
An Otomi language variety is a specific regional or social form of the Otomi language, distinguished by its own phonological, lexical, and grammatical features within the broader Otomi linguistic continuum.
-
D.
variety of the Terena language
A variety of the Terena language is a distinct regional or social form of Terena characterized by systematic differences in pronunciation, vocabulary, or grammar while remaining mutually intelligible with other forms.
-
E.
variety of the Uma language
A variety of the Uma language is a distinct regional or social form of Uma characterized by systematic differences in pronunciation, vocabulary, or grammar while remaining mutually intelligible with other forms.
- F. None of above. chosen
Provenance (1 batch)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69f76e2190f88190beb2eed798a4ef01 |
completed | May 3, 2026, 3:47 p.m. |
Created at: May 3, 2026, 4:07 p.m.