Triple
T35847291
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Administrative Courts of First Instance |
E1036247
|
entity |
| Predicate | mayGrantRemedy |
P74042
|
FINISHED |
| Object | annulment of unlawful administrative acts |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: annulment of unlawful administrative acts | Statement: [Administrative Courts of First Instance, mayGrantRemedy, annulment of unlawful administrative acts]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: mayGrantRemedy Context triple: [Administrative Courts of First Instance, mayGrantRemedy, annulment of unlawful administrative acts]
-
A.
mayGrant
chosen
Indicates that one entity has the authority or permission to confer, assign, or bestow a right, privilege, or resource to another entity.
-
B.
mayGuarantee
Indicates that one entity has the potential or authority to provide a guarantee for another entity or outcome.
-
C.
hasRemedy
Indicates that one entity serves as a remedy, treatment, or corrective measure for a problem, condition, or undesirable state associated with another entity.
-
D.
mayGrantLeaveToAppeal
Indicates that an authority has the power or discretion to allow a party to proceed with an appeal.
-
E.
mayProsecute
Indicates that one party has the legal authority or permission to initiate and conduct prosecution against another party.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69f76e1a29e8819088280f26096aeb55 |
completed | May 3, 2026, 3:47 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69f7aa3883d48190b05e3d2da7a017ae |
completed | May 3, 2026, 8:04 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69f7a8d435288190b30b1991fb003121 |
completed | May 3, 2026, 7:58 p.m. |
Created at: May 3, 2026, 4:06 p.m.