Triple
T357995
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | 2000 United States presidential election |
E7585
|
entity |
| Predicate | electoralCollegeSystem |
P539
|
FINISHED |
| Object | decisive in outcome |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: decisive in outcome | Statement: [2000 United States presidential election, electoralCollegeSystem, decisive in outcome]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: electoralCollegeSystem Context triple: [2000 United States presidential election, electoralCollegeSystem, decisive in outcome]
-
A.
electionMethod
chosen
Indicates the process or system used to select a candidate or make a decision in an election.
-
B.
elects
Indicates that one entity selects or chooses another entity for a position, role, or office, typically through a formal voting process.
-
C.
hasElectoralVotes
Indicates that a political entity (such as a state or district) possesses a specified number of votes in an electoral system used to choose an officeholder.
-
D.
electoralSuccess
Indicates that an entity has achieved a favorable or winning outcome in an election or electoral process.
-
E.
electoralVotesWinner
Indicates that the subject is the candidate who received the highest number of electoral votes in a given election.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69a2e7e696948190bebc966535995e45 |
completed | Feb. 28, 2026, 1:04 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69a2ebb0e348819086e3ccd96c7b129e |
completed | Feb. 28, 2026, 1:20 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69a2e959ce948190a201c017eecb7c95 |
completed | Feb. 28, 2026, 1:10 p.m. |
Created at: Feb. 28, 2026, 1:08 p.m.