Triple
T357982
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | 2000 United States presidential election |
E7585
|
entity |
| Predicate | SupremeCourtEffect |
P12285
|
FINISHED |
| Object | halted Florida manual recounts |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: halted Florida manual recounts | Statement: [2000 United States presidential election, SupremeCourtEffect, halted Florida manual recounts]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: SupremeCourtEffect Context triple: [2000 United States presidential election, SupremeCourtEffect, halted Florida manual recounts]
-
A.
chiefJustice
Indicates that one entity serves as the chief justice (the highest-ranking judicial officer) of another entity, such as a court or jurisdiction.
-
B.
highestCourtOf
Indicates that one entity is the supreme judicial authority or top-level court within the jurisdiction or legal system of another entity.
-
C.
chiefJusticeAtDecision
Indicates that the specified person was serving as the chief justice at the time a particular decision was made.
-
D.
notableSupremeCourtCase
Indicates that a legal case is recognized as a significant or influential decision by the Supreme Court.
-
E.
supremacyClause
Indicates that one legal authority, rule, or agreement takes precedence over and invalidates conflicting lower-level laws or provisions.
- F. None of above. chosen
Provenance (4 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69a2e7e696948190bebc966535995e45 |
completed | Feb. 28, 2026, 1:04 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69a2ebb0e348819086e3ccd96c7b129e |
completed | Feb. 28, 2026, 1:20 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69a2e959ce948190a201c017eecb7c95 |
completed | Feb. 28, 2026, 1:10 p.m. |
| PDg | Predicate description generation | batch_69a2ea2c44408190946267525c88e811 |
completed | Feb. 28, 2026, 1:14 p.m. |
Created at: Feb. 28, 2026, 1:08 p.m.