Triple
T3577839
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | PRISM |
E75729
|
entity |
| Predicate | canIncidentallyCollect |
P49811
|
FINISHED |
| Object | communications of U.S. persons |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: communications of U.S. persons | Statement: [PRISM, canIncidentallyCollect, communications of U.S. persons]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: canIncidentallyCollect Context triple: [PRISM, canIncidentallyCollect, communications of U.S. persons]
-
A.
canCollect
Indicates that one entity has the ability or permission to gather, receive, or take possession of another entity.
-
B.
collectedThrough
Indicates that something was obtained, gathered, or acquired by means of a specified process, method, or channel.
-
C.
canBring
Indicates that one entity has the ability or permission to bring another entity or item to a particular place or context.
-
D.
canHold
Indicates that one entity has the capacity or ability to contain, support, or carry another entity.
-
E.
canConcurIn
Indicates that one entity is able or permitted to agree with, coincide with, or participate jointly in the same event, decision, or condition as another entity.
- F. None of above. chosen
Provenance (4 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69ad85d5e3008190bdfe0bacdd1f5a1b |
completed | March 8, 2026, 2:21 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69adc0dd3e048190a0c6666e13ead9cd |
completed | March 8, 2026, 6:33 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69adb83810c481909c645c08b978edc1 |
completed | March 8, 2026, 5:56 p.m. |
| PDg | Predicate description generation | batch_69adb8e4ba948190a9b777cf7f788b96 |
completed | March 8, 2026, 5:59 p.m. |
Created at: March 8, 2026, 3:21 p.m.