Triple

T35630448
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Local government areas of Tasmania E1029569 entity
Predicate hasNumberOfLGAs P41115 FINISHED
Object 29 LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: 29 | Statement: [Local government areas of Tasmania, hasNumberOfLGAs, 29]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: hasNumberOfLGAs
Context triple: [Local government areas of Tasmania, hasNumberOfLGAs, 29]
  • A. numberOfLocalGovernmentAreas chosen
    Indicates the count of local government areas associated with a given entity or region.
  • B. hasLocalGovernmentAreas
    Indicates that an entity is administratively divided into, or associated with, one or more local government areas.
  • C. hasNumberOfMunicipalities
    Indicates the relationship that specifies how many municipalities are associated with or contained within a given administrative or geographic entity.
  • D. hasNumberOfAdministrativeTerritorialEntities
    Indicates the count of administrative territorial units (such as states, provinces, or districts) that an entity is divided into or comprises.
  • E. hasNumberOfSubdistricts
    Indicates the relationship specifying how many subdistricts are associated with a given entity.
  • F. None of above.

Provenance (3 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69f76e07bb0c8190968ea2d836fc42c9 completed May 3, 2026, 3:47 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69ff0214d7348190904688376df99bce completed May 9, 2026, 9:44 a.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69feffd62fec8190a855922c8b3c57cf completed May 9, 2026, 9:35 a.m.
Created at: May 3, 2026, 4:05 p.m.