Triple
T3558835
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | California Hokan |
E75284
|
entity |
| Predicate | comprises |
P35
|
FINISHED |
| Object | Washo language |
E75283
|
NE FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Washo language | Statement: [California Hokan, comprises, Washo language]
NED1
Entity disambiguation (via context triple)
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: Washo language Context triple: [California Hokan, comprises, Washo language]
-
A.
Washo language
chosen
The Washo language is a Native American language isolate traditionally spoken by the Washoe people of the Lake Tahoe region in California and Nevada.
-
B.
Wapishana language
The Wapishana language is an indigenous Arawakan language spoken primarily by the Wapishana people in parts of Brazil and Guyana.
-
C.
Waja language
The Waja language is a lesser-known Niger-Congo language spoken by the Waja people of northeastern Nigeria.
-
D.
Kwaio language
The Kwaio language is an Austronesian language spoken by the Kwaio people on Malaita in the Solomon Islands.
-
E.
Refaluwasch language
The Refaluwasch language is an Austronesian language spoken by the Carolinian people of the Northern Mariana Islands, particularly on Saipan and nearby islands.
- F. None of above.
- G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69ad85d45090819086f34fb85d850a1e |
completed | March 8, 2026, 2:21 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69adc0881d50819092332491b9527c9d |
completed | March 8, 2026, 6:31 p.m. |
| NED1 | Entity disambiguation (via context triple) | batch_69b3bb9983f48190bda2749d93c74a8d |
completed | March 13, 2026, 7:24 a.m. |
Created at: March 8, 2026, 3:20 p.m.