Triple
T3558828
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | California Hokan |
E75284
|
entity |
| Predicate | comprises |
P35
|
FINISHED |
| Object | Chimariko language |
E77374
|
NE FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Chimariko language | Statement: [California Hokan, comprises, Chimariko language]
NED1
Entity disambiguation (via context triple)
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: Chimariko language Context triple: [California Hokan, comprises, Chimariko language]
-
A.
Chimariko language
chosen
The Chimariko language is an extinct Native American language once spoken in northwestern California, often classified within the proposed Hokan language family.
-
B.
Mikasuki language
The Mikasuki language is a Native American Muskogean language traditionally spoken by the Miccosukee and Seminole peoples of Florida.
-
C.
Kawaiisu language
Kawaiisu language is an endangered Uto-Aztecan language traditionally spoken by the Kawaiisu people of southern California.
-
D.
Kitanemuk language
The Kitanemuk language is an extinct Uto-Aztecan language once spoken by the Kitanemuk people of Southern California.
-
E.
Amuesha language
The Amuesha language, also known as Yanesha', is an Arawakan language spoken by the Yanesha' people of the central Peruvian Amazon.
- F. None of above.
- G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69ad85d45090819086f34fb85d850a1e |
completed | March 8, 2026, 2:21 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69adc0881d50819092332491b9527c9d |
completed | March 8, 2026, 6:31 p.m. |
| NED1 | Entity disambiguation (via context triple) | batch_69b3bb9983f48190bda2749d93c74a8d |
completed | March 13, 2026, 7:24 a.m. |
Created at: March 8, 2026, 3:20 p.m.