Triple
T3558763
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Appendix II |
E75282
|
entity |
| Predicate | updatedAt |
P4421
|
FINISHED |
| Object | meetings of the Conference of the Parties |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: meetings of the Conference of the Parties | Statement: [Appendix II, updatedAt, meetings of the Conference of the Parties]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: updatedAt Context triple: [Appendix II, updatedAt, meetings of the Conference of the Parties]
-
A.
amendedAt
Indicates the date and time at which an existing entity or record was modified or updated.
-
B.
createdAt
Indicates the date and time at which an entity was initially created or came into existence.
-
C.
laterModifiedTo
Indicates that an entity was changed or updated at a later time into another specified form or state.
-
D.
updated
chosen
Indicates that an entity has been modified or brought to a more recent state compared to its previous version or status.
-
E.
dateRevisedTo
Indicates that an entity’s date has been updated or changed to a new specified date.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69ad85d45090819086f34fb85d850a1e |
completed | March 8, 2026, 2:21 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69adc0881d50819092332491b9527c9d |
completed | March 8, 2026, 6:31 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69adb834779081908468e182d5f6cf02 |
completed | March 8, 2026, 5:56 p.m. |
Created at: March 8, 2026, 3:20 p.m.