Triple
T35567768
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Faden Away |
E1027823
|
entity |
| Predicate | alsoKnownForArtistAlias |
P84992
|
FINISHED |
| Object | Snoopzilla |
—
|
NE NERFINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Snoopzilla | Statement: [Faden Away, alsoKnownForArtistAlias, Snoopzilla]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: alsoKnownForArtistAlias Context triple: [Faden Away, alsoKnownForArtistAlias, Snoopzilla]
-
A.
alsoKnownAs
Indicates that one entity is an alternative name, alias, or designation for another entity.
-
B.
hasMusicalAlias
chosen
Indicates that an entity is known or performs under an alternative musical name or stage name.
-
C.
recordingArtistLaterKnownAs
Indicates that the subject is a recording artist who was later known by the name or identity represented by the object.
-
D.
notableAssociatedArtist
Indicates that there is a significant or noteworthy association between an artist and another entity, such as a work, organization, or place.
-
E.
associatedWithArtistNickname
Indicates that an entity is connected to or identified by a particular artist’s nickname or pseudonym.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69f76e020fd8819081cb080e7e203083 |
completed | May 3, 2026, 3:47 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69f79ec355048190af30123ceb6efa2b |
completed | May 3, 2026, 7:15 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69f79e4bdbcc8190be7a0d2cf8a77b64 |
completed | May 3, 2026, 7:13 p.m. |
Created at: May 3, 2026, 4:04 p.m.