Triple

T35523
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Secretary of the Army E702 entity
Predicate includedIn P1393 FINISHED
Object line of succession to the Secretary of Defense LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: line of succession to the Secretary of Defense | Statement: [Secretary of the Army, includedIn, line of succession to the Secretary of Defense]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: includedIn
Context triple: [Secretary of the Army, includedIn, line of succession to the Secretary of Defense]
  • A. includes chosen
    Indicates that one entity contains, encompasses, or has another entity as a part, member, or subset.
  • B. featuredIn
    Indicates that one entity appears or is prominently included within another entity, such as a person, work, or item being showcased in a larger work, event, or context.
  • C. annexedBy
    Indicates that one entity has been incorporated into and brought under the control or sovereignty of another entity.
  • D. appearsIn
    Indicates that an entity is present, featured, or occurs within a particular context, work, or medium.
  • E. describedIn
    Indicates that information about an entity is contained or documented within a specified source, such as a text, document, or media.
  • F. None of above.

Provenance (3 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69a2479dec388190967ba648663442c9 completed Feb. 28, 2026, 1:40 a.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69a24989c3308190af59dfae37cfc32f completed Feb. 28, 2026, 1:48 a.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69a24873e97c8190b9e4279e43b6de14 completed Feb. 28, 2026, 1:44 a.m.
Created at: Feb. 28, 2026, 1:44 a.m.