Triple
T355143
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Ann Putnam Jr. |
E7525
|
entity |
| Predicate | apologyIssued |
P12205
|
FINISHED |
| Object | 1706 |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: 1706 | Statement: [Ann Putnam Jr., apologyIssued, 1706]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: apologyIssued Context triple: [Ann Putnam Jr., apologyIssued, 1706]
-
A.
confessedTo
Indicates that one entity admitted guilt or revealed the truth about an action, wrongdoing, or secret to another entity.
-
B.
confessedAs
Indicates that one entity has admitted or acknowledged being or doing something, typically revealing guilt, identity, or involvement in relation to another entity.
-
C.
releaseOf
Indicates the act or event of something being set free, made available, or discharged from a prior state of containment, control, or restriction.
-
D.
affirms
Indicates that one entity explicitly confirms, supports, or asserts the truth or validity of another entity, statement, or proposition.
-
E.
plea
Indicates that a defendant formally states their response (such as guilty, not guilty, or no contest) to criminal charges in a legal proceeding.
- F. None of above. chosen
Provenance (4 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69a2e7e696948190bebc966535995e45 |
completed | Feb. 28, 2026, 1:04 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69a2eb8312f4819084dc222e665fded3 |
completed | Feb. 28, 2026, 1:20 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69a2e9589e7c8190b2d3af8f858c96af |
completed | Feb. 28, 2026, 1:10 p.m. |
| PDg | Predicate description generation | batch_69a2ea0a4c448190a8a179daa9b90645 |
completed | Feb. 28, 2026, 1:13 p.m. |
Created at: Feb. 28, 2026, 1:08 p.m.