Triple
T355131
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Ann Putnam Jr. |
E7525
|
entity |
| Predicate | testifiedAgainst |
P9856
|
FINISHED |
| Object | Sarah Osborne |
E19674
|
NE FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Sarah Osborne | Statement: [Ann Putnam Jr., testifiedAgainst, Sarah Osborne]
NED1
Entity disambiguation (via context triple)
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: Sarah Osborne Context triple: [Ann Putnam Jr., testifiedAgainst, Sarah Osborne]
-
A.
Sarah Osborne
chosen
Sarah Osborne was one of the first women accused of witchcraft during the 1692 Salem witch trials in colonial Massachusetts.
-
B.
Harriet Pitt
Harriet Pitt was an 18th-century British actress and the daughter of statesman William Pitt the Elder.
-
C.
Margaret Blagge
Margaret Blagge was an English gentlewoman at the court of Charles II, noted for her piety and for being the first wife of statesman Sidney Godolphin, 1st Earl of Godolphin.
-
D.
Elizabeth Eldridge
Elizabeth Eldridge was the wife of Salem Village minister Samuel Parris, associated with the period of the Salem witch trials in late 17th-century Massachusetts.
-
E.
Elizabeth Carver
Elizabeth Carver was the wife of British Field Marshal Bernard Montgomery, 1st Viscount Montgomery of Alamein.
- F. None of above.
- G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69a2e7e696948190bebc966535995e45 |
completed | Feb. 28, 2026, 1:04 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69a2ee043fac8190af72291c04761687 |
completed | Feb. 28, 2026, 1:30 p.m. |
| NED1 | Entity disambiguation (via context triple) | batch_69a3eca750748190b5a2914f318bc1c2 |
completed | March 1, 2026, 7:37 a.m. |
Created at: Feb. 28, 2026, 1:08 p.m.