Triple

T35454469
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Louis Ducos du Hauron E1024731 entity
Predicate usedColorModel P52856 FINISHED
Object red-green-blue separation LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: red-green-blue separation | Statement: [Louis Ducos du Hauron, usedColorModel, red-green-blue separation]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: usedColorModel
Context triple: [Louis Ducos du Hauron, usedColorModel, red-green-blue separation]
  • A. hasColorModel chosen
    Indicates that an entity uses or is associated with a particular color representation model (such as RGB, CMYK, or HSV) for defining its colors.
  • B. colorUse
    Indicates that one entity uses, applies, or is associated with a particular color in its appearance, design, or representation.
  • C. coversColorSpace
    Indicates that one entity’s color representation range fully includes or spans the color space defined by another entity.
  • D. usesColorMatchingFunctions
    Indicates that one entity applies color matching functions to relate or convert color stimuli between different color spaces or representations.
  • E. usedUniformColor
    Indicates that multiple entities share or employed the same uniform color in a given context.
  • F. None of above.

Provenance (3 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69f76df92f108190817222e520e22268 completed May 3, 2026, 3:47 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69f79da9f80c8190b0afd8509f28747b completed May 3, 2026, 7:10 p.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69f79617d40481909ba372f94209c08b completed May 3, 2026, 6:38 p.m.
Created at: May 3, 2026, 4:04 p.m.