Triple
T35364930
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Jarmen |
E1021602
|
entity |
| Predicate | hasLocalCouncil |
P3379
|
FINISHED |
| Object |
Jarmen town council
Jarmen town council is the local governing body responsible for municipal administration and community affairs in the town of Jarmen.
|
E2137597
|
NE FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Jarmen town council | Statement: [Jarmen, hasLocalCouncil, Jarmen town council]
NEDg
Description generation
gpt-5.1
Instruction
Generate a one-sentence description of the target entity. You are given a context triple in the form (subject, predicate, object), where the object is the target entity. # Instructions Use the triple to infer relevant information about the entity. Describe the entity based on what is most defining, well-known. Avoid repeating the information from the triple, unless really essential. # Response Format Return only the sentence: "Description: [one-sentence description of the target entity]"
Input
Entity: Jarmen town council Triple: [Jarmen, hasLocalCouncil, Jarmen town council]
Generated description
Jarmen town council is the local governing body responsible for municipal administration and community affairs in the town of Jarmen.
Provenance (5 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69f76df000488190ab7c97f565677055 |
completed | May 3, 2026, 3:46 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69f791d200a08190b850623d264de4ff |
completed | May 3, 2026, 6:20 p.m. |
| NED1 | Entity disambiguation (via context triple) | batch_6a3823dd42d481908486775704558de1 |
completed | June 21, 2026, 5:48 p.m. |
| NEDg | Description generation | batch_6a3824d5a74c8190ae63ee78a409afd5 |
completed | June 21, 2026, 5:52 p.m. |
| NED2 | Entity disambiguation (via description) | batch_6a3826b8a46c81909104152da09055b0 |
completed | June 21, 2026, 6 p.m. |
Created at: May 3, 2026, 4:03 p.m.