Triple
T353369
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Sweden |
E7489
|
entity |
| Predicate | longstandingPolicy |
P4795
|
FINISHED |
| Object | military neutrality |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: military neutrality | Statement: [Sweden, longstandingPolicy, military neutrality]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: longstandingPolicy Context triple: [Sweden, longstandingPolicy, military neutrality]
-
A.
governingPolicy
Indicates that one entity serves as the authoritative policy or set of rules that directs, constrains, or regulates the behavior, operation, or decisions of another entity.
-
B.
reappointmentPolicy
Indicates the rules or conditions governing whether and how an individual can be reappointed to a position or role.
-
C.
policyStance
chosen
Indicates the position or viewpoint an entity holds regarding a specific policy or set of policies.
-
D.
implementedPolicy
Indicates that a particular policy has been put into effect or carried out by an entity.
-
E.
supportsPolicy
Indicates that one entity endorses, backs, or is in favor of a particular policy or set of policies.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69a2e7e696948190bebc966535995e45 |
completed | Feb. 28, 2026, 1:04 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69a2eb80f524819093f4c2c18c3d615f |
completed | Feb. 28, 2026, 1:20 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69a2e9571bd88190b6fcb16f21604720 |
completed | Feb. 28, 2026, 1:10 p.m. |
Created at: Feb. 28, 2026, 1:08 p.m.