Triple
T35310122
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Höfle Telegram |
E1019745
|
entity |
| Predicate | supportsEvidenceFor |
P3650
|
FINISHED |
| Object | scale of Operation Reinhard killings |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: scale of Operation Reinhard killings | Statement: [Höfle Telegram, supportsEvidenceFor, scale of Operation Reinhard killings]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: supportsEvidenceFor Context triple: [Höfle Telegram, supportsEvidenceFor, scale of Operation Reinhard killings]
-
A.
providesEvidenceFor
chosen
Indicates that one entity serves as support, justification, or proof for the validity or truth of another entity.
-
B.
presentsEvidenceTo
Indicates that one entity formally provides or shows evidence to another entity, typically to support a claim, argument, or decision.
-
C.
supportsTheory
Indicates that one entity provides evidence, justification, or endorsement for the validity or acceptance of another entity’s theory.
-
D.
evidenceAgainst
Indicates that one entity serves as evidence challenging, contradicting, or undermining the validity, truth, or reliability of another entity.
-
E.
supportsConclusionOf
Indicates that one entity provides justification, evidence, or reasoning that backs up or helps establish the conclusion represented by another entity.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69f76de8b4c48190ae504b86185c474c |
completed | May 3, 2026, 3:46 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_6a037c8c34f88190ace26f555827f23e |
completed | May 12, 2026, 7:16 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_6a037a0324d08190ac5b610cc0f6a38c |
completed | May 12, 2026, 7:05 p.m. |
Created at: May 3, 2026, 4:03 p.m.