Triple
T3530103
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | James B. Cobb Jr. |
E74637
|
entity |
| Predicate | notableWork |
P4
|
FINISHED |
| Object | So in to You |
E337273
|
NE FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: So in to You | Statement: [James B. Cobb Jr., notableWork, So in to You]
NED1
Entity disambiguation (via context triple)
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: So in to You Context triple: [James B. Cobb Jr., notableWork, So in to You]
-
A.
So Into You
chosen
"So Into You" is a soft rock hit song by the Atlanta Rhythm Section, released in 1977 and known for its smooth melody and romantic lyrics.
-
B.
So in Love
"So in Love" is a romantic ballad by Cole Porter, best known as one of the standout songs from his 1948 musical *Kiss Me, Kate*.
-
C.
Run to You
"Run to You" is a 1993 power ballad by Whitney Houston, known for its emotional vocal performance and inclusion on The Bodyguard film soundtrack.
-
D.
Die For You
"Die For You" is a popular R&B song by Canadian singer The Weeknd, known for its emotive vocals, atmospheric production, and enduring chart success.
-
E.
You Want This
"You Want This" is an upbeat, funk-infused R&B song by Janet Jackson from her 1993 album "janet."
- F. None of above.
- G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69ad85d1a3948190931fd1ea1f49717b |
completed | March 8, 2026, 2:21 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69adbc9764a881908aa8d25dc9adf59e |
completed | March 8, 2026, 6:14 p.m. |
| NED1 | Entity disambiguation (via context triple) | batch_69b37e97536881908d5ed3dfe602c9e0 |
completed | March 13, 2026, 3:03 a.m. |
Created at: March 8, 2026, 3:19 p.m.