Triple
T35288212
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | 1991 Wales Conference Finals |
E1019148
|
entity |
| Predicate | notablePlayerOnLosingTeam |
P57545
|
FINISHED |
| Object | Ray Bourque |
E10567
|
NE FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Ray Bourque | Statement: [1991 Wales Conference Finals, notablePlayerOnLosingTeam, Ray Bourque]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: notablePlayerOnLosingTeam Context triple: [1991 Wales Conference Finals, notablePlayerOnLosingTeam, Ray Bourque]
-
A.
notablePlayerLosingTeam
chosen
Indicates that a particular player is a prominent or noteworthy member of the team that lost a given game or match.
-
B.
notablePlayerInFinal
Indicates that a player had a significant or standout role in the final match or game of a competition.
-
C.
notablePlayerWinningTeam
Indicates that a particular notable player was a member of the team that won a given competition or game.
-
D.
notablePlayerRunnerUpTeam
Indicates that a player is notably associated with a team by having finished as a runner-up (e.g., in a tournament or competition) while playing for that team.
-
E.
notableBowlParticipant
Indicates that an entity has participated in a bowl game in a way considered notable or significant.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (4 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69f76de6d39c8190bb11342e4b91ff2b |
completed | May 3, 2026, 3:46 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_6a037c8c34f88190ace26f555827f23e |
completed | May 12, 2026, 7:16 p.m. |
| NED1 | Entity disambiguation (via context triple) | batch_6a38401b5e848190a26c758ab8a0c163 |
completed | June 21, 2026, 7:48 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_6a037a0324d08190ac5b610cc0f6a38c |
completed | May 12, 2026, 7:05 p.m. |
Created at: May 3, 2026, 4:03 p.m.