Triple

T35263143
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Tell Me E1018422 entity
Predicate hasContemporaryProduction P62901 FINISHED
Object true LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: true | Statement: [Tell Me, hasContemporaryProduction, true]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: hasContemporaryProduction
Context triple: [Tell Me, hasContemporaryProduction, true]
  • A. currentProduction
    Indicates that an entity is presently engaged in producing, manufacturing, or generating another entity or output.
  • B. hasNewProduction
    Indicates that a new instance or version of a production (such as a manufactured item, media work, or process) has been created or is now associated with the referenced entity.
  • C. hasNotableContemporary
    Indicates that one entity is recognized as a significant or prominent contemporary (living or active in the same period) of another entity.
  • D. hasProduction
    Indicates that an entity is associated with, or responsible for, the creation or manufacture of another entity or product.
  • E. notableModernProduction chosen
    Indicates that there is a significant or well-recognized contemporary production or staging associated with the subject.
  • F. None of above.

Provenance (3 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69f76de4be5c8190a51705c07612cac8 completed May 3, 2026, 3:46 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_6a037c8c34f88190ace26f555827f23e completed May 12, 2026, 7:16 p.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_6a037a016960819093ed4990fb4d9d36 completed May 12, 2026, 7:05 p.m.
Created at: May 3, 2026, 4:02 p.m.