Triple
T35206001
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Sancha of Aragon |
E1016533
|
entity |
| Predicate | typeOfMarriagePolitics |
P203540
|
FINISHED |
| Object | dynastic alliance |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: dynastic alliance | Statement: [Sancha of Aragon, typeOfMarriagePolitics, dynastic alliance]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: typeOfMarriagePolitics Context triple: [Sancha of Aragon, typeOfMarriagePolitics, dynastic alliance]
-
A.
marriageType
Indicates the specific legal or social category of a marriage relationship that exists between two spouses.
-
B.
maritalPolicy
Indicates a relationship where an authority or institution defines rules, conditions, or norms governing marriage between individuals.
-
C.
regardsMarriageAs
Indicates that one entity holds a particular view, attitude, or evaluative stance toward the institution or concept of marriage.
-
D.
hasAttitudeTowardMarriage
Indicates that an entity holds a particular opinion, feeling, or stance regarding the institution or concept of marriage.
-
E.
maritalStyleOf
Indicates the characteristic manner, pattern, or quality of interaction that defines a particular marriage or marital relationship.
- F. None of above. chosen
Provenance (4 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69f76ddf549c8190869d0af076fd2c28 |
completed | May 3, 2026, 3:46 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_6a019dfc69fc8190b0d80279a6216ba7 |
completed | May 11, 2026, 9:14 a.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_6a019d54586c81908292d4880db9fad2 |
completed | May 11, 2026, 9:11 a.m. |
| PDg | Predicate description generation | batch_6a019dfba430819089f5609d89fbb7d9 |
completed | May 11, 2026, 9:14 a.m. |
Created at: May 3, 2026, 4:02 p.m.