Triple

T3516396
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Murdock v. Pennsylvania E74317 entity
Predicate fullCaseName P3131 FINISHED
Object Murdock v. Commonwealth of Pennsylvania E74317 NE FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Murdock v. Commonwealth of Pennsylvania | Statement: [Murdock v. Pennsylvania, fullCaseName, Murdock v. Commonwealth of Pennsylvania]
NED1 Entity disambiguation (via context triple) gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07 
Target entity: Murdock v. Commonwealth of Pennsylvania
Context triple: [Murdock v. Pennsylvania, fullCaseName, Murdock v. Commonwealth of Pennsylvania]
  • A. Murdock v. Pennsylvania chosen
    Murdock v. Pennsylvania is a 1943 U.S. Supreme Court case that held it unconstitutional to impose a license tax on the distribution of religious literature, reinforcing First Amendment protections for religious proselytizing.
  • B. Fulton v. City of Philadelphia
    Fulton v. City of Philadelphia is a 2021 U.S. Supreme Court case in which the Court unanimously ruled that Philadelphia violated a Catholic foster care agency’s religious freedom by excluding it from the foster program over its refusal to certify same-sex couples.
  • C. McDonald v. Smith
    McDonald v. Smith is a 1985 U.S. Supreme Court case that held the First Amendment’s Petition Clause does not grant absolute immunity from libel suits for statements made in petitions to government officials.
  • D. Cooley v. Board of Wardens
    Cooley v. Board of Wardens is an 1852 U.S. Supreme Court decision that helped define the scope of the Commerce Clause by allowing states to regulate certain local aspects of commerce, such as port pilotage, without violating federal authority.
  • E. Prigg v. Pennsylvania
    Prigg v. Pennsylvania was an 1842 U.S. Supreme Court case that upheld federal supremacy over state laws in enforcing the return of escaped enslaved people, significantly strengthening the legal force of the Fugitive Slave Clause.
  • F. None of above.
  • G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.

Provenance (3 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69ad85cfb5c881909c9a2edd9d6043cc completed March 8, 2026, 2:21 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69adbc31c0688190a890621a901f5f5f completed March 8, 2026, 6:13 p.m.
NED1 Entity disambiguation (via context triple) batch_69b37e7da9c08190ab417b45339513bd completed March 13, 2026, 3:03 a.m.
Created at: March 8, 2026, 3:19 p.m.