Triple
T35105027
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Simeuse twins |
E1013127
|
entity |
| Predicate | relationshipToEachOther |
P206838
|
FINISHED |
| Object | identical twins |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: identical twins | Statement: [Simeuse twins, relationshipToEachOther, identical twins]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: relationshipToEachOther Context triple: [Simeuse twins, relationshipToEachOther, identical twins]
-
A.
relationshipToRelative
Indicates the specific familial connection or kinship role that one person has in relation to a particular relative.
-
B.
relationshipToParents
Indicates the type or nature of a person's familial relationship to their parents.
-
C.
relationshipToHumans
Indicates the nature or type of connection, association, or relevance that something has specifically with humans.
-
D.
addressesRelationship
Indicates that one entity directs communication, remarks, or attention specifically toward another entity.
-
E.
basisOfRelationship
Indicates that one entity serves as the foundational reason, cause, or justification for the relationship that exists between two or more entities.
- F. None of above. chosen
Provenance (4 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69f76dd556248190808b4c4f43debebb |
completed | May 3, 2026, 3:46 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_6a037c92f03c8190ae2751270b195423 |
completed | May 12, 2026, 7:16 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_6a037a016960819093ed4990fb4d9d36 |
completed | May 12, 2026, 7:05 p.m. |
| PDg | Predicate description generation | batch_6a037c82179081908325a59b8539b3a8 |
completed | May 12, 2026, 7:16 p.m. |
Created at: May 3, 2026, 4:01 p.m.