Triple
T3496235
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Song Cycle |
E73857
|
entity |
| Predicate | hasTypeOfLyrics |
P9652
|
FINISHED |
| Object | allusive, literary lyrics |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: allusive, literary lyrics | Statement: [Song Cycle, hasTypeOfLyrics, allusive, literary lyrics]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: hasTypeOfLyrics Context triple: [Song Cycle, hasTypeOfLyrics, allusive, literary lyrics]
-
A.
hasLyric
Indicates that one entity (typically a musical work or track) contains or is associated with the lyrics provided by another entity.
-
B.
hasLyricsTheme
Indicates that the lyrics of a work primarily concern or revolve around a specified theme or subject.
-
C.
hasOfficialLyrics
Indicates that an entity (such as a song or musical work) has lyrics that are formally recognized or authorized as the official version.
-
D.
hasLyricalStyle
chosen
Indicates that one entity possesses or is characterized by a particular lyrical style in relation to another entity or context.
-
E.
hasVariableLyrics
Indicates that the lyrics of a song or musical piece change between different performances, versions, or contexts.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69ad85cdb6e48190a335d412b9194ed8 |
completed | March 8, 2026, 2:21 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69adbbd16c0081908f13535f459618d1 |
completed | March 8, 2026, 6:11 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69adae0b34908190b2bb5766a2231f7a |
completed | March 8, 2026, 5:12 p.m. |
Created at: March 8, 2026, 3:18 p.m.