Triple
T3496026
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Songs Cycled |
E73851
|
entity |
| Predicate | includesMaterial |
P1393
|
FINISHED |
| Object | previously released songs |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: previously released songs | Statement: [Songs Cycled, includesMaterial, previously released songs]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: includesMaterial Context triple: [Songs Cycled, includesMaterial, previously released songs]
-
A.
materialProvidedFor
Indicates that one entity supplies or makes available a material for use, processing, or incorporation by another entity or purpose.
-
B.
materialUsed
Indicates that one entity is made from, incorporates, or utilizes the other entity as its material or substance.
-
C.
additionalMaterialBy
Indicates that one entity serves as supplementary or supporting material created by a specified agent or source.
-
D.
includes
chosen
Indicates that one entity contains, encompasses, or has another entity as a part, member, or subset.
-
E.
hasMaterialOption
Indicates that an entity can be made from, or is available in, one or more alternative materials.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69ad85cdb6e48190a335d412b9194ed8 |
completed | March 8, 2026, 2:21 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69adbbb06fd08190b6c1fadfce4148f0 |
completed | March 8, 2026, 6:10 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69adae0b34908190b2bb5766a2231f7a |
completed | March 8, 2026, 5:12 p.m. |
Created at: March 8, 2026, 3:18 p.m.