Triple

T34934878
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Harold Krebs E1007537 entity
Predicate relationshipToRomance P205614 FINISHED
Object lack of interest in romantic relationships LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: lack of interest in romantic relationships | Statement: [Harold Krebs, relationshipToRomance, lack of interest in romantic relationships]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: relationshipToRomance
Context triple: [Harold Krebs, relationshipToRomance, lack of interest in romantic relationships]
  • A. relationshipDynamic
    Indicates a changing or evolving pattern of interaction between entities, such as shifts in their roles, closeness, or influence over time.
  • B. sexualRelationshipTo
    Indicates that one entity has engaged in a sexual relationship or sexual activity with another entity.
  • C. relationshipFocus
    Indicates a relationship where particular attention, priority, or emphasis is placed on the connection between two or more entities.
  • D. relationshipType
    Indicates the specific kind of relationship that exists between two or more entities.
  • E. relationshipToLady
    Indicates the specific type of social, familial, or personal connection that one entity has to a lady.
  • F. None of above. chosen

Provenance (4 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69f76dc513fc819084a1ff52abbfa5bc completed May 3, 2026, 3:46 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_6a037c92f03c8190ae2751270b195423 completed May 12, 2026, 7:16 p.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_6a0379ff1ba081908eda86acefcf69fb completed May 12, 2026, 7:05 p.m.
PDg Predicate description generation batch_6a037c80ba448190853011097a151b7e completed May 12, 2026, 7:16 p.m.
Created at: May 3, 2026, 4 p.m.