Triple
T34909685
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Miss Amelia |
E1006829
|
entity |
| Predicate | relationshipTypeWith Marvin Macy |
P203784
|
FINISHED |
| Object | brief and disastrous marriage |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: brief and disastrous marriage | Statement: [Miss Amelia, relationshipTypeWith Marvin Macy, brief and disastrous marriage]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: relationshipTypeWith Marvin Macy Context triple: [Miss Amelia, relationshipTypeWith Marvin Macy, brief and disastrous marriage]
-
A.
relationshipTypeWithMarvin
chosen
Indicates the specific nature or category of the relationship an entity has with Marvin.
-
B.
relationshipTypeWithMarnie
Indicates the specific nature or category of relationship that an entity has with Marnie.
-
C.
relationshipToMarcy
Indicates that one entity has a specified personal or social relationship to Marcy.
-
D.
relationToVonMaur
Indicates a specified type of relationship or association that an entity has with Von Maur.
-
E.
relationshipStatusWithMarnie
Indicates the nature or current state of the relationship that an entity has with Marnie.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69f76dc1b4a081909b4c6e4d8ec0aa2d |
completed | May 3, 2026, 3:46 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_6a037c8c34f88190ace26f555827f23e |
completed | May 12, 2026, 7:16 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_6a0379ff1ba081908eda86acefcf69fb |
completed | May 12, 2026, 7:05 p.m. |
Created at: May 3, 2026, 4 p.m.