Triple

Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).

Phrase: Cantwell v. Connecticut, 310 U.S. 296 (1940) | Statement: [State v. Cantwell, 126 Conn. 1, 8 A.2d 533 (1939), followedBy, Cantwell v. Connecticut, 310 U.S. 296 (1940)]

Target entity: Cantwell v. Connecticut, 310 U.S. 296 (1940)
Context triple: [State v. Cantwell, 126 Conn. 1, 8 A.2d 533 (1939), followedBy, Cantwell v. Connecticut, 310 U.S. 296 (1940)]

• A. Cantwell v. Connecticut chosen
  Cantwell v. Connecticut is a 1940 U.S. Supreme Court case that first applied the First Amendment’s Free Exercise Clause to the states, striking down a state law that improperly restricted religious proselytizing.
• B. Chaplinsky v. New Hampshire
  Chaplinsky v. New Hampshire is a 1942 U.S. Supreme Court case that established the "fighting words" doctrine, holding that certain personally abusive epithets are not protected by the First Amendment.
• C. Alden v. Maine
  Alden v. Maine is a 1999 U.S. Supreme Court decision that expanded state sovereign immunity by holding that states are generally immune from private suits for damages in their own courts under federal law.
• D. Gitlow v. New York
  Gitlow v. New York is a 1925 U.S. Supreme Court case that marked a major step in applying First Amendment free speech protections to the states through the Fourteenth Amendment.
• E. Katzenbach v. Morgan
  Katzenbach v. Morgan is a 1966 U.S. Supreme Court case that upheld Congress’s power under the Fourteenth Amendment to prohibit certain state voting restrictions, reinforcing federal authority to protect voting rights.
• F. None of above.
• G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.