Triple

T3487254
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject State v. Cantwell, 126 Conn. 1, 8 A.2d 533 (1939) E73637 entity
Predicate relatedCase P3137 FINISHED
Object Cantwell v. Connecticut, 310 U.S. 296 (1940) E15188 NE FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Cantwell v. Connecticut, 310 U.S. 296 (1940) | Statement: [State v. Cantwell, 126 Conn. 1, 8 A.2d 533 (1939), relatedCase, Cantwell v. Connecticut, 310 U.S. 296 (1940)]
NED1 Entity disambiguation (via context triple) gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: Cantwell v. Connecticut, 310 U.S. 296 (1940)
Context triple: [State v. Cantwell, 126 Conn. 1, 8 A.2d 533 (1939), relatedCase, Cantwell v. Connecticut, 310 U.S. 296 (1940)]
  • A. Cantwell v. Connecticut chosen
    Cantwell v. Connecticut is a 1940 U.S. Supreme Court case that first applied the First Amendment’s Free Exercise Clause to the states, striking down a state law that improperly restricted religious proselytizing.
  • B. Alden v. Maine
    Alden v. Maine is a 1999 U.S. Supreme Court decision that expanded state sovereign immunity by holding that states are generally immune from private suits for damages in their own courts under federal law.
  • C. Gitlow v. New York
    Gitlow v. New York is a 1925 U.S. Supreme Court case that marked a major step in applying First Amendment free speech protections to the states through the Fourteenth Amendment.
  • D. Katzenbach v. Morgan
    Katzenbach v. Morgan is a 1966 U.S. Supreme Court case that upheld Congress’s power under the Fourteenth Amendment to prohibit certain state voting restrictions, reinforcing federal authority to protect voting rights.
  • E. Katzenbach v. McClung
    Katzenbach v. McClung is a 1964 U.S. Supreme Court case that upheld the federal government’s power to prohibit racial discrimination in local restaurants under the Civil Rights Act of 1964.
  • F. None of above.
  • G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.

Provenance (3 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69ad85cca8d4819088494e9f3340fab5 completed March 8, 2026, 2:21 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69adbb9059f881908f9cbe544365c8df completed March 8, 2026, 6:10 p.m.
NED1 Entity disambiguation (via context triple) batch_69b36826ff448190880f1ee708d93215 completed March 13, 2026, 1:28 a.m.
Created at: March 8, 2026, 3:18 p.m.