Triple

Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).

Phrase: State v. Cantwell | Statement: [State v. Cantwell, 126 Conn. 1, 8 A.2d 533 (1939), fullCaseName, State v. Cantwell]

Target entity: State v. Cantwell
Context triple: [State v. Cantwell, 126 Conn. 1, 8 A.2d 533 (1939), fullCaseName, State v. Cantwell]

• A. Oregon v. Elstad
  Oregon v. Elstad is a 1985 U.S. Supreme Court decision holding that a suspect’s later, properly Mirandized confession can be admissible even if an earlier unwarned statement was obtained in violation of Miranda.
• B. State v. Cantwell, 126 Conn. 1, 8 A.2d 533 (1939) chosen
  State v. Cantwell, 126 Conn. 1, 8 A.2d 533 (1939), is the Connecticut Supreme Court decision that preceded and was later reviewed in the landmark U.S. Supreme Court First Amendment case Cantwell v. Connecticut.
• C. De Jonge v. Oregon
  De Jonge v. Oregon is a 1937 U.S. Supreme Court case that held the right to peaceful assembly is a fundamental liberty protected by the Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment and thus applies to the states.
• D. Scopes v. State
  Scopes v. State was the 1927 Tennessee Supreme Court decision in the famous “Scopes Monkey Trial,” which tested the legality of teaching evolution in public schools and highlighted the clash between modern science and religious fundamentalism.
• E. Strickland v. Washington
  Strickland v. Washington is a landmark 1984 U.S. Supreme Court case that established the two-pronged test for determining when a criminal defendant’s right to effective assistance of counsel has been violated.
• F. None of above.
• G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.