Triple
T3483411
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Hancock County, Maine |
E73548
|
entity |
| Predicate | contains |
P35
|
FINISHED |
| Object | Surry, Maine |
E494861
|
NE FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Surry, Maine | Statement: [Hancock County, Maine, contains, Surry, Maine]
NED1
Entity disambiguation (via context triple)
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: Surry, Maine Context triple: [Hancock County, Maine, contains, Surry, Maine]
-
A.
Lovell, Maine
Lovell, Maine is a small rural town in Oxford County known for its scenic lakes and mountains in western Maine.
-
B.
Monmouth, Maine
Monmouth, Maine is a small rural town in central Maine known for its lakes, agricultural heritage, and proximity to the state capital region.
-
C.
Shapleigh, Maine
Shapleigh, Maine is a small rural town in southwestern Maine known for its forests, lakes, and outdoor recreation.
-
D.
Ellsworth, Maine
chosen
Ellsworth, Maine is a small city in Hancock County that serves as a commercial hub and gateway to the Downeast region and nearby Acadia National Park.
-
E.
Porter, Maine
Porter, Maine is a small rural town in Oxford County known for its scenic setting near the New Hampshire border and its traditional New England character.
- F. None of above.
- G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69ad85b3c9b08190857cae74c7f36da9 |
completed | March 8, 2026, 2:20 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69adbb781e9c8190810fdd814f506127 |
completed | March 8, 2026, 6:10 p.m. |
| NED1 | Entity disambiguation (via context triple) | batch_69d20c75bf508190a812c87950cb5227 |
completed | April 5, 2026, 7:17 a.m. |
Created at: March 8, 2026, 3:17 p.m.