Triple
T34822927
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Faith Lehane |
E1003835
|
entity |
| Predicate | relationshipTypeWith Mayor Richard Wilkins |
P205568
|
FINISHED |
| Object | ally |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: ally | Statement: [Faith Lehane, relationshipTypeWith Mayor Richard Wilkins, ally]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: relationshipTypeWith Mayor Richard Wilkins Context triple: [Faith Lehane, relationshipTypeWith Mayor Richard Wilkins, ally]
-
A.
relationshipTypeWith Willis Davidge
Indicates the specific nature or category of the relationship that an entity has with Willis Davidge.
-
B.
hasMayor
Indicates that one entity serves as the mayor of another entity, typically a city, town, or municipality.
-
C.
underMayor
Indicates that one entity holds a position, role, or responsibility that is subordinate to or overseen by a mayor.
-
D.
formerMayor
Indicates that the subject once held the position of mayor of the object entity but no longer does.
-
E.
cityMayor
Indicates that one entity serves as the mayor (chief elected municipal official) of the city represented by the other entity.
- F. None of above. chosen
Provenance (4 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69f76db717088190811b4e744610f37d |
completed | May 3, 2026, 3:45 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_6a037c92f03c8190ae2751270b195423 |
completed | May 12, 2026, 7:16 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_6a0379ff1ba081908eda86acefcf69fb |
completed | May 12, 2026, 7:05 p.m. |
| PDg | Predicate description generation | batch_6a037c80ba448190853011097a151b7e |
completed | May 12, 2026, 7:16 p.m. |
Created at: May 3, 2026, 4 p.m.