Triple

T34810360
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject LLM in International Law E1003482 entity
Predicate commonModules P197939 FINISHED
Object international human rights law LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: international human rights law | Statement: [LLM in International Law, commonModules, international human rights law]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: commonModules
Context triple: [LLM in International Law, commonModules, international human rights law]
  • A. coreModule
    Indicates that something functions as a primary or foundational module within a larger system or structure.
  • B. commonOn
    Indicates that two or more entities share the same location, context, or medium where they are present or occur together.
  • C. commonApplication
    Indicates that multiple entities share or participate in the same application, process, or usage context.
  • D. commonIn
    Indicates that something frequently occurs, appears, or is found within a specified context, group, or environment.
  • E. commonFor
    Indicates that something is typical, usual, or frequently occurring for a given entity or context.
  • F. None of above. chosen

Provenance (4 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69f76db600b88190989abdf08fce3b27 completed May 3, 2026, 3:45 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69feba0f09508190b3e871c62b19ec7f completed May 9, 2026, 4:37 a.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69feb957fe7c8190969fb31a6d1a59c8 completed May 9, 2026, 4:34 a.m.
PDg Predicate description generation batch_69feba0e362c81909883a3f24a4a9545 completed May 9, 2026, 4:37 a.m.
Created at: May 3, 2026, 3:59 p.m.