Triple
T34795374
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | R v Penguin Books Ltd |
E1003061
|
entity |
| Predicate | introducedEvidenceType |
P3168
|
FINISHED |
| Object | expert literary testimony |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: expert literary testimony | Statement: [R v Penguin Books Ltd, introducedEvidenceType, expert literary testimony]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: introducedEvidenceType Context triple: [R v Penguin Books Ltd, introducedEvidenceType, expert literary testimony]
-
A.
usedEvidenceType
chosen
Indicates that a particular type or category of evidence was employed or relied upon in a given context or activity.
-
B.
presentsEvidenceTo
Indicates that one entity formally provides or shows evidence to another entity, typically to support a claim, argument, or decision.
-
C.
evidenceTypeHandled
Indicates that an entity is responsible for processing or managing a particular type or category of evidence.
-
D.
providesEvidenceFor
Indicates that one entity serves as support, justification, or proof for the validity or truth of another entity.
-
E.
evidenceAtIssue
Indicates that a particular piece of evidence is directly contested, disputed, or central to the disagreement or decision in a case or situation.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69f76db543808190b188c6c86a91491b |
completed | May 3, 2026, 3:45 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69fe00dad1708190b6522476bebb43af |
completed | May 8, 2026, 3:27 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69fdfc3717f48190bb50ac2919c8ef95 |
completed | May 8, 2026, 3:07 p.m. |
Created at: May 3, 2026, 3:59 p.m.