Triple
T34770110
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Marianne Engblom |
E1002339
|
entity |
| Predicate | rightsAsserted |
P5532
|
FINISHED |
| Object | Third Amendment protection against quartering of soldiers |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Third Amendment protection against quartering of soldiers | Statement: [Marianne Engblom, rightsAsserted, Third Amendment protection against quartering of soldiers]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: rightsAsserted Context triple: [Marianne Engblom, rightsAsserted, Third Amendment protection against quartering of soldiers]
-
A.
rightsEnforced
Indicates that legal or moral rights are actively upheld, protected, or compelled through appropriate mechanisms or actions.
-
B.
rights
chosen
Indicates that an entity possesses entitlements, permissions, or legal/moral claims in relation to another entity or context.
-
C.
rightsImplicated
Indicates that certain rights are affected, challenged, or brought into question as a consequence of the related action or relationship.
-
D.
rightsCategory
Indicates the classification or type of rights associated with an entity or relationship.
-
E.
rightsConcept
Indicates that there is a conceptual or definitional relationship involving rights, such as the idea, principle, or framework underlying specific rights.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69f76db20dac8190b1e8d0ca4dc1d59f |
completed | May 3, 2026, 3:45 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69f77ffa6b68819090257fed3802c239 |
completed | May 3, 2026, 5:03 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69f7795978c481909e152cd1bd02dd07 |
completed | May 3, 2026, 4:35 p.m. |
Created at: May 3, 2026, 3:59 p.m.