Triple
T34734341
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Jonathan Reynolds Jr. |
E1001297
|
entity |
| Predicate | relationshipToJonathan Reynolds Sr. |
P205535
|
FINISHED |
| Object | son |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: son | Statement: [Jonathan Reynolds Jr., relationshipToJonathan Reynolds Sr., son]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: relationshipToJonathan Reynolds Sr. Context triple: [Jonathan Reynolds Jr., relationshipToJonathan Reynolds Sr., son]
-
A.
relationshipToJonathanKent
Indicates the specific familial or personal relationship that an entity has to Jonathan Kent.
-
B.
relationshipToJoni
Indicates the specific familial, social, or professional connection that one entity has to the person or entity named Joni.
-
C.
relationToStephenI
Indicates a familial or social relationship that an entity has specifically with Stephen I.
-
D.
relationshipToParents
Indicates the type or nature of a person's familial relationship to their parents.
-
E.
relationshipWithJohnGustafsonJr.
Indicates that there exists some form of relationship or connection between an entity and John Gustafson Jr.
- F. None of above. chosen
Provenance (4 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69f76daf739881909ed3554f98a2b433 |
completed | May 3, 2026, 3:45 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_6a037c92f03c8190ae2751270b195423 |
completed | May 12, 2026, 7:16 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_6a0379fd7aac8190873077e63873aa72 |
completed | May 12, 2026, 7:05 p.m. |
| PDg | Predicate description generation | batch_6a037c80ba448190853011097a151b7e |
completed | May 12, 2026, 7:16 p.m. |
Created at: May 3, 2026, 3:59 p.m.