Triple
T34721648
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Reliance Infrastructure |
E1000931
|
entity |
| Predicate | hasEPCProjectsIn |
P51910
|
FINISHED |
| Object | power sector |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: power sector | Statement: [Reliance Infrastructure, hasEPCProjectsIn, power sector]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: hasEPCProjectsIn Context triple: [Reliance Infrastructure, hasEPCProjectsIn, power sector]
-
A.
hasProjectIn
chosen
Indicates that an entity is involved with or associated with a project that takes place within a specified location or context.
-
B.
hasProject
Indicates that an entity is associated with or responsible for a particular project.
-
C.
hasMaintenanceProjectsBy
Indicates that one entity is responsible for or associated with carrying out maintenance projects on another entity.
-
D.
hasPlannedProjects
Indicates that an entity is associated with projects that are intended or scheduled to be carried out in the future.
-
E.
hasNearbyProject
Indicates that one entity has a project located within a close or specified proximity to another entity or reference point.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69f76daeb6e48190a4c9a6b0edc80f72 |
completed | May 3, 2026, 3:45 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69f77ffa6b68819090257fed3802c239 |
completed | May 3, 2026, 5:03 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69f7795978c481909e152cd1bd02dd07 |
completed | May 3, 2026, 4:35 p.m. |
Created at: May 3, 2026, 3:59 p.m.