Triple

T347188
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Nathanael Greene E6966 entity
Predicate appointedToPosition P8660 FINISHED
Object Commander of the Southern Department LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Commander of the Southern Department | Statement: [Nathanael Greene, appointedToPosition, Commander of the Southern Department]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: appointedToPosition
Context triple: [Nathanael Greene, appointedToPosition, Commander of the Southern Department]
  • A. appointed chosen
    Indicates that one entity formally assigns another entity to a position, role, or responsibility.
  • B. appointedAfter
    Indicates that one entity was appointed to a position or role at a later time than another entity.
  • C. appointedAs
    Indicates that one entity is formally assigned or designated to hold a specific role, position, or title in relation to another entity.
  • D. appointedBy
    Indicates that one entity has been formally selected or assigned to a position, role, or office by another entity.
  • E. appointedByOffice
    Indicates that an entity attains its position or role through a formal appointment made by a specific office or official authority.
  • F. None of above.

Provenance (3 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69a2e7951ba08190960e90823b5078f3 completed Feb. 28, 2026, 1:03 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69a2eb1a37c08190b1380f6bf8513a37 completed Feb. 28, 2026, 1:18 p.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69a2e95451a4819090f4e4fb9b21a493 completed Feb. 28, 2026, 1:10 p.m.
Created at: Feb. 28, 2026, 1:08 p.m.