Triple
T3470823
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Piscataquis County, Maine |
E73253
|
entity |
| Predicate | contains |
P35
|
FINISHED |
| Object | Greenville, Maine |
E690196
|
NE FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Greenville, Maine | Statement: [Piscataquis County, Maine, contains, Greenville, Maine]
NED1
Entity disambiguation (via context triple)
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: Greenville, Maine Context triple: [Piscataquis County, Maine, contains, Greenville, Maine]
-
A.
Greenville, Maine
chosen
Greenville, Maine is a small town in Piscataquis County that serves as the primary gateway and service hub to Maine’s remote Moosehead Lake wilderness region.
-
B.
Greenwood, Maine
Greenwood, Maine is a small rural town in Oxford County known for its scenic lakes, forests, and outdoor recreation in western Maine.
-
C.
Georgetown, Maine
Georgetown, Maine is a small coastal town in Sagadahoc County known for its fishing heritage, scenic shoreline, and popular Reid State Park.
-
D.
Woodville, Maine
Woodville, Maine is a small rural town located in Penobscot County in the central part of the state.
-
E.
Greenfield, Maine
Greenfield, Maine is a small rural town located in Penobscot County in the central part of the state.
- F. None of above.
- G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69ad85b2fed48190948c8765e453d270 |
completed | March 8, 2026, 2:20 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69adbb3af0cc81909e575828caeaeae0 |
completed | March 8, 2026, 6:08 p.m. |
| NED1 | Entity disambiguation (via context triple) | batch_69d1aef47b908190a7aff84fbf2759db |
completed | April 5, 2026, 12:38 a.m. |
Created at: March 8, 2026, 3:17 p.m.