Triple
T34691891
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Moroccan monarchy |
E890920
|
entity |
| Predicate | keyConstitutionalReform |
P5553
|
FINISHED |
| Object | 2011 constitutional reform |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: 2011 constitutional reform | Statement: [Moroccan monarchy, keyConstitutionalReform, 2011 constitutional reform]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: keyConstitutionalReform Context triple: [Moroccan monarchy, keyConstitutionalReform, 2011 constitutional reform]
-
A.
constitutionalReformSubject
Indicates that an entity is the subject or focus of a constitutional reform process, proposal, or change.
-
B.
constitutionalChange
chosen
Indicates a formal modification, addition, or removal of provisions within a constitution or foundational legal framework.
-
C.
canAmendConstitution
Indicates that an entity has the authority or power to modify or revise a constitution.
-
D.
constitutionalConvention
Indicates a formal gathering or assembly convened to draft, revise, or adopt a constitution or fundamental governing framework.
-
E.
constitutionalChangeFrom
Indicates a relationship where one constitutional state, framework, or arrangement is transformed or replaced by another, marking the source state from which the change originates.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69f349db7ab8819086808e833f472871 |
completed | April 30, 2026, 12:23 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69f7235395488190b246679f9ee8c508 |
completed | May 3, 2026, 10:28 a.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69f72157af108190880317a62e634bb0 |
completed | May 3, 2026, 10:20 a.m. |
Created at: May 1, 2026, 2:05 a.m.