Triple
T34677411
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Arizona Supreme Court justices (for policy implementation) |
E890529
|
entity |
| Predicate | instanceOf |
P0
|
FINISHED |
| Object | member of the judiciary of Arizona |
C2825
|
CONCEPT FINISHED |
How this triple was built (1 step)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
CD
Concept disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target class: member of the judiciary of Arizona Context triple: [Arizona Supreme Court justices (for policy implementation), instanceOf, member of the judiciary of Arizona]
-
A.
judicial office holder
A judicial office holder is an individual formally appointed to exercise judicial authority, making decisions and judgments in legal proceedings within a court or tribunal.
-
B.
American judge
chosen
An American judge is a public official in the United States judiciary who interprets and applies the law, presides over legal proceedings, and issues rulings and judgments in accordance with the U.S. Constitution and relevant statutes.
-
C.
Governor of Arizona
The Governor of Arizona is the state's chief executive officer responsible for implementing state laws, overseeing the executive branch, proposing budgets and policies, and representing Arizona in intergovernmental affairs.
-
D.
former judge
A former judge is an individual who previously held judicial office and exercised legal authority in a court of law but no longer serves in that official capacity.
-
E.
county of Arizona
A county of Arizona is a primary local government and administrative division within the state of Arizona, responsible for regional services such as law enforcement, courts, public records, and infrastructure across its defined geographic area.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (1 batch)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69f349dabc008190a18999c26682ed47 |
completed | April 30, 2026, 12:23 p.m. |
Created at: May 1, 2026, 2:05 a.m.