Triple

T34637135
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Blind Alfred Reed E889456 entity
Predicate hasRecordingIn P155529 FINISHED
Object Bristol Sessions E2105099 NE FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Bristol Sessions | Statement: [Blind Alfred Reed, hasRecordingIn, Bristol Sessions]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: hasRecordingIn
Context triple: [Blind Alfred Reed, hasRecordingIn, Bristol Sessions]
  • A. hasRecordingWith
    Indicates that one entity is associated with or includes a particular recording as part of its content or representation.
  • B. hasLiveRecordingFrom
    Indicates that a live recording was made of something (e.g., a work, performance, or event) at or from a specified source, venue, or occasion.
  • C. hasWorkRecordingsOn chosen
    Indicates that an entity has associated work recordings stored on or linked to another entity (such as a medium, platform, or system).
  • D. hasRe-recording
    Indicates that one recording is a new or updated version made again from the same original material or performance.
  • E. hasRecordingLegacy
    Indicates that an entity is associated with a historical or prior version of a recording, capturing its legacy or earlier state.
  • F. None of above.

Provenance (4 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69f349d724848190b63ad3407e0006d9 completed April 30, 2026, 12:23 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_6a037c8c34f88190ace26f555827f23e completed May 12, 2026, 7:16 p.m.
NED1 Entity disambiguation (via context triple) batch_6a375bd004a081908a03f177d65d5c22 completed June 21, 2026, 3:34 a.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_6a0379fd7aac8190873077e63873aa72 completed May 12, 2026, 7:05 p.m.
Created at: May 1, 2026, 2:04 a.m.