Triple
T34561511
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Dr. Anton Arcane |
E887352
|
entity |
| Predicate | relationshipToAbigailArcane |
P205468
|
FINISHED |
| Object | uncle |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: uncle | Statement: [Dr. Anton Arcane, relationshipToAbigailArcane, uncle]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: relationshipToAbigailArcane Context triple: [Dr. Anton Arcane, relationshipToAbigailArcane, uncle]
-
A.
relationshipToAgnes
Indicates the specific familial, social, or other relational connection that one entity has to the person named Agnes.
-
B.
relationshipToAgnesAndTobias
Indicates the specific familial, social, or other relational connection that an entity has to the pair Agnes and Tobias considered together.
-
C.
relationshipToArcite
Indicates the type or nature of the relationship that one entity has to Arcite.
-
D.
relationshipToEleanorVance
Indicates the specific nature or type of relationship an entity has with Eleanor Vance.
-
E.
relationshipToBarnabasCollins
Indicates the type or nature of a subject’s personal or familial connection to Barnabas Collins.
- F. None of above. chosen
Provenance (4 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69f349d0c4d881908dd0950f5eb9ec0a |
completed | April 30, 2026, 12:23 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_6a037c92f03c8190ae2751270b195423 |
completed | May 12, 2026, 7:16 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_6a0379fd7aac8190873077e63873aa72 |
completed | May 12, 2026, 7:05 p.m. |
| PDg | Predicate description generation | batch_6a037c80ba448190853011097a151b7e |
completed | May 12, 2026, 7:16 p.m. |
Created at: May 1, 2026, 2:02 a.m.