Triple

T34560965
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Anacortes, Washington, United States E887339 entity
Predicate hasNearbyRefinery P16607 FINISHED
Object Marathon Anacortes Refinery NE NERFINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Marathon Anacortes Refinery | Statement: [Anacortes, Washington, United States, hasNearbyRefinery, Marathon Anacortes Refinery]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: hasNearbyRefinery
Context triple: [Anacortes, Washington, United States, hasNearbyRefinery, Marathon Anacortes Refinery]
  • A. hasRefinery chosen
    Indicates that one entity possesses, operates, or is associated with a refinery facility used for processing raw materials.
  • B. hasNearbyProductionArea
    Indicates that one entity has a production area located in close physical proximity to it.
  • C. hasNearbyOilField
    Indicates that an entity is located close to or in the vicinity of an oil field.
  • D. isMajorRefineryIn
    Indicates that a refinery is a primary or significant refining facility located within a specified geographic area or jurisdiction.
  • E. hasNearbyColony
    Indicates that one entity has another entity located close enough to be considered a nearby colony.
  • F. None of above.

Provenance (3 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69f349d0c4d881908dd0950f5eb9ec0a completed April 30, 2026, 12:23 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69ffe01c9d3c819084c256bb3c81c0dc completed May 10, 2026, 1:32 a.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69ffdfcc78b08190aa4493f13d62a531 completed May 10, 2026, 1:30 a.m.
Created at: May 1, 2026, 2:02 a.m.